Forecasting neutrino masses from galaxy clustering in the Dark Energy Survey combined with the Planck Measurements
Ofer Lahav (UCL), Angeliki Kiakotou (UCL), Filipe B. Abdalla (UCL),, Chris Blake (Swinburne)

TL;DR
This study demonstrates that combining data from the Dark Energy Survey and Planck can significantly improve constraints on neutrino masses, potentially detecting masses greater than 0.1 eV with high confidence.
Contribution
It presents a novel combined analysis of galaxy clustering and CMB data to improve neutrino mass constraints, highlighting the importance of galaxy bias knowledge.
Findings
DES & Planck can recover the fiducial neutrino mass with +-0.12 eV uncertainty.
The combined data set tightens the neutrino mass upper limit to 0.11 eV if the true mass is near zero.
The analysis is robust to non-linearities and redshift distortions but sensitive to galaxy bias assumptions.
Abstract
We study the prospects for detecting neutrino masses from the galaxy angular power spectrum in photometric redshift shells of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) over a volume of 20 (Gpc/h)^3 combined with the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) angular fluctuations expected to be measured from the Planck satellite. We find that for a Lambda-CDM concordance model with 7 free parameters in addition to a fiducial neutrino mass of M_nu = 0.24 eV, we recover from DES &Planck the correct value with uncertainty of +- 0.12 eV (95 % CL), assuming perfect knowledge of the galaxy biasing. If the fiducial total mass is close to zero, then the upper limit is 0.11 eV (95 % CL). This upper limit from DES &Planck is over 3 times tighter than using Planck alone, as DES breaks the parameter degeneracies in a CMB-only analysis. The analysis utlilizes spherical harmonics up to 300, averaged in bin of 10 to mimic…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
