Some counterexamples in the theory of quantum isometry groups
Jyotishman Bhowmick, Debashish Goswami

TL;DR
This paper presents counterexamples in quantum isometry groups showing they may lack $C^*$-actions and universal objects, challenging assumptions in the theory of quantum symmetries of spectral triples.
Contribution
It demonstrates that quantum isometry groups can fail to have $C^*$-actions and may not possess universal objects, providing new insights into their structure.
Findings
Quantum isometry groups may lack $C^*$-actions.
They can fail to be matrix quantum groups.
The category of such isometries may lack a universal object.
Abstract
By considering spectral triples on () constructed by Chakraborty and Pal (\cite{chak_pal}), we show that in general the quantum group of volume and orientation preserving isometries (in the sense of \cite{goswami2}) for a spectral triple of compact type may not have a -action, and moreover, it can fail to be a matrix quantum group. It is also proved that the category with objects consisting of those volume and orientation preserving quantum isometries which induce -action on the algebra underlying the given spectral triple, may not have a universal object.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
