Alternative derivation of the response of interferometric gravitational wave detectors
Neil J. Cornish

TL;DR
This paper presents an alternative, simplified derivation of the response of interferometric gravitational wave detectors, addressing previous errors and offering a pedagogical approach by adapting methods from spacecraft Doppler tracking and pulsar timing.
Contribution
It introduces a new derivation method that avoids known errors and simplifies understanding of gravitational wave detector responses.
Findings
Provides a corrected derivation of interferometer response
Adapts spacecraft Doppler tracking and pulsar timing methods
Offers a pedagogical, simplified derivation
Abstract
It has recently been pointed out by Finn that the long-standing derivation of the response of an interferometric gravitational wave detector contains several errors. Here I point out that a contemporaneous derivation of the gravitational wave response for spacecraft doppler tracking and pulsar timing avoids these pitfalls, and when adapted to describe interferometers, recovers a simplified version of Finn's derivation. This simplified derivation may be useful for pedagogical purposes.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research · Geophysics and Gravity Measurements
