
TL;DR
The paper proposes a systematic naming scheme for the 403 known extrasolar planets, linking names to their constellations and mythologies, challenging the view that planets should remain unnamed due to their abundance.
Contribution
It introduces a practical and mythologically inspired naming scheme for extrasolar planets, addressing the impracticality of current scientific designations.
Findings
Names are assigned based on constellation association.
Most names are derived from Roman-Greek mythology.
The scheme can incorporate other mythologies.
Abstract
Extrasolar planets are not named and are referred to only by their assigned scientific designation. The reason given by the IAU to not name the planets is that it is considered impractical as planets are expected to be common. I advance some reasons as to why this logic is flawed, and suggest names for the 403 extrasolar planet candidates known as of Oct 2009. The names follow a scheme of association with the constellation that the host star pertains to, and therefore are mostly drawn from Roman-Greek mythology. Other mythologies may also be used given that a suitable association is established.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsHistorical Astronomy and Related Studies · History and Developments in Astronomy · Astronomical and nuclear sciences
