Un successeur de Bouguer : \'Etienne B\'ezout (1730 -- 1783) commissaire pour la marine \`a l'Acad\'emie royale des sciences
Liliane Alfonsi (IMJ, Ghdso)

TL;DR
This paper explores Étienne Bézout's role as a naval examiner and scholar, analyzing his contributions to navigation and his participation in scientific debates, highlighting his influence on maritime science in 18th-century France.
Contribution
It provides a detailed historical analysis of Bézout's responsibilities, publications, and scientific interactions, especially his comparison with Bouguer's navigation work.
Findings
Bézout examined naval personnel at major French ports.
He participated in a notable debate on navigation literature.
His 1769 Traité de navigation reflects contemporary scientific standards.
Abstract
\'Etienne B\'ezout, member of the Acad\'emie Royale des Sciences, have to study some works and books sended at the Acad\'emy. In this article, we will look at this responsibility for Navy, before and after 1764, which is the year of B\'ezout's nomination at the charge of Examinateur des Gardes du Pavillon et de la Marine. Each year he must go to Brest, Rochefort and Toulon harbours to examine the Gardes de la Marine. This give to him titles and qualifications as expert in sailing. We will see his participation at an Academy polemic : Blondeau versus Bouguer/Lacaille on a navigation book. Almost in the same time, \'Etienne B\'ezout will be member of the Acad\'emie de Marine de Brest in 1769. We will see his work in this last Academy. At last, we will study his Trait\'e de navigation, written in 1769 and we will compare to Bouguer's Navigation book.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
