The Impact of Theoretical Uncertainties in the Halo Mass Function and Halo Bias on Precision Cosmology
Hao-Yi Wu (1), Andrew R. Zentner (2), Risa H. Wechsler (1) ((1) KIPAC,, Stanford University (2) University of Pittsburgh)

TL;DR
This paper assesses how theoretical uncertainties in the halo mass function and halo bias affect dark energy constraints from galaxy cluster surveys, emphasizing the need for high-precision predictions to optimize cosmological insights.
Contribution
It quantifies the required accuracy levels for halo mass function and bias predictions to ensure minimal impact on dark energy parameter estimation in upcoming surveys.
Findings
Mass function accuracy needs to be ~1% for DES-like surveys.
Halo bias accuracy requirement is ~5%, less stringent if observable-mass distribution is well constrained.
For large-area, low-mass cluster surveys, mass function and bias must be predicted to ~0.5% and ~1%, respectively.
Abstract
We study the impact of theoretical uncertainty in the dark matter halo mass function and halo bias on dark energy constraints from imminent galaxy cluster surveys. We find that for an optical cluster survey like the Dark Energy Survey, the accuracy required on the predicted halo mass function to make it an insignificant source of error on dark energy parameters is ~ 1%. The analogous requirement on the predicted halo bias is less stringent (~ 5%), particularly if the observable-mass distribution can be well constrained by other means. These requirements depend upon survey area but are relatively insensitive to survey depth. The most stringent requirements are likely to come from a survey over a significant fraction of the sky that aims to observe clusters down to relatively low mass, Mth ~ 10^13.7 Msun/h; for such a survey, the mass function and halo bias must be predicted to accuracies…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
