Rejoinder: Citation Statistics
Robert Adler, John Ewing, Peter Taylor
TL;DR
This paper responds to critiques of citation statistics, defending their use and addressing concerns about their interpretation and application in scientific evaluation.
Contribution
It clarifies misunderstandings and advocates for the appropriate use of citation metrics in assessing scientific impact.
Findings
Citation statistics can be useful when properly interpreted.
Misuse of citation metrics can lead to misleading evaluations.
The paper emphasizes careful application of citation data.
Abstract
Rejoinder to "Citation Statistics" [arXiv:0910.3529]
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.