TL;DR
This paper provides a critical commentary on the analysis and conclusions presented in the original 'Citation Statistics' work, discussing the implications and limitations of citation metrics.
Contribution
It offers a detailed critique and perspective on the methodologies and interpretations of citation statistics in scientific evaluation.
Findings
Highlights limitations of citation metrics
Questions the validity of certain statistical measures
Suggests alternative approaches for assessing scientific impact
Abstract
Comment on "Citation Statistics" [arXiv:0910.3529]
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.