The inclusion of the Schur algebra in B(l^2) is not inverse-closed
Romain Tessera

TL;DR
This paper disproves a conjecture by Q. Sun by showing that the Schur algebra, consisting of operators bounded on l^1 and l^{ty}, is not inverse-closed, as an invertible operator in l^2 has an inverse not bounded on l^1 or l^{ty}.
Contribution
The paper provides a counterexample demonstrating that the Schur algebra is not inverse-closed, challenging previous conjectures in operator algebra theory.
Findings
Counterexample of an operator in the Schur algebra with an inverse not in the algebra.
Disproof of Q. Sun's conjecture on inverse-closedness.
Clarification of the limitations of the Schur algebra's inverse properties.
Abstract
The Schur algebra is the algebra of operators which are bounded on l^1 and on l^{\infty}. Q. Sun conjectured that the Schur algebra is inverse-closed. In this note, we disprove this conjecture. Precisely, we exhibit an operator in the Schur algebra, invertible in l^2, whose inverse is not bounded on l^1 nor on l^{\infty}.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Algebra and Geometry · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models · Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
