A Spitzer Unbiased Ultradeep Spectroscopic Survey
B. Bertincourt (1, 2), G. Helou (2), P. Appleton (2, 3), P. Ogle, (2), G. Lagache (1), T. Brooke (2), J.-D. Smith (4), K. Sheth (2), D. Dale, (5), M. Harwit (6), J.-L. Puget (1), H. Roussel (7) ((1) IAS, (2), IPAC/Caltech, (3) NHSC, (4) U. Toledo, (5) U. Wyoming, (6) Cornell

TL;DR
This paper presents an unbiased, deep spectroscopic survey of the GOODS-North field using Spitzer IRS, revealing diverse galaxy spectral types, redshift distribution, and luminosities, with a new technique for redshift measurement.
Contribution
It introduces a new cross-correlation method for redshift estimation from IRS spectra and provides a comprehensive spectroscopic dataset of faint infrared sources.
Findings
Detected 45 sources with diverse spectral features.
Redshifts range from 0.2 to 2.2, median at 1.
Fewer AGN than previous samples due to lower luminosities.
Abstract
We carried out an unbiased, spectroscopic survey using the low-resolution module of the infrared spectrograph (IRS) on board Spitzer targeting two 2.6 square arcminute regions in the GOODS-North field. IRS was used in spectral mapping mode with 5 hours of effective integration time per pixel. One region was covered between 14 and 21 microns and the other between 20 and 35 microns. We extracted spectra for 45 sources. About 84% of the sources have reported detections by GOODS at 24 microns, with a median F_nu(24um) ~ 100 uJy. All but one source are detected in all four IRAC bands, 3.6 to 8 microns. We use a new cross-correlation technique to measure redshifts and estimate IRS spectral types; this was successful for ~60% of the spectra. Fourteen sources show significant PAH emission, four mostly SiO absorption, eight present mixed spectral signatures (low PAH and/or SiO) and two show a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
