Evolution of the Early-Type Galaxy Fraction in Clusters since z = 0.8
Luc Simard, Douglas Clowe, Vandana Desai, Julianne J. Dalcanton, Anja, von der Linden, Bianca M. Poggianti, Simon D. M. White, Alfonso, Aragon-Salamanca, Gabriella De Lucia, Claire Halliday, Pascale Jablonka, Bo, Milvang-Jensen, Roberto P. Saglia, Roser Pello, Gregory H. Rudnick

TL;DR
This study examines how the fraction of early-type galaxies in clusters evolves from redshift 0.8 to the present, revealing a modest increase over time and highlighting differences between high-redshift and local clusters.
Contribution
It provides a detailed comparison of morphological content in high-redshift and local clusters using quantitative bulge+disk decompositions, revealing evolutionary trends and environmental influences.
Findings
Early-type galaxy fraction increases by ~25% from z=0.8 to z=0.06.
High-redshift clusters have lower early-type fractions than local clusters.
Strong correlation between galaxy morphology and star formation activity.
Abstract
We study the morphological content of a large sample of high-redshift clusters to determine its dependence on cluster mass and redshift. Quantitative morphologies are based on bulge+disk decompositions of cluster and field galaxies on deep VLT/FORS2 images of 18 optically-selected clusters at 0.45 < z < 0.80 from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey (EDisCS). Morphological content is given by the early-type galaxy fraction f_et, and early-type galaxies are selected based on their bulge fraction and image smoothness. A set of 158 SDSS clusters is analyzed exactly as the EDisCS sample to provide a robust local comparison. Our main results are: (1) f_et values for the SDSS and EDisCS clusters exhibit no clear trend as a function of sigma. (2) Mid-z EDisCS clusters around sigma = 500 km/s have f_et ~= 0.5 whereas high-z EDisCS clusters have f_et ~= 0.4 (~25% increase over 2 Gyrs). (3) There is a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
