Galaxy luminosities, stellar masses, sizes, velocity dispersions as a function of morphological type
M. Bernardi, F. Shankar, J. B. Hyde, S. Mei, F. Marulli, R. K. Sheth

TL;DR
This paper analyzes galaxy properties like luminosity, size, and mass across morphological types using SDSS data, revealing new insights into galaxy composition, structure, and formation histories.
Contribution
It provides detailed fits to galaxy property distributions, compares morphological classifications, and uncovers new trends in galaxy mass, shape, and age relations, highlighting formation process complexities.
Findings
Ellipticals account for ~20% of luminosity density and 25% of stellar mass density.
Massive galaxies (>5x10^{11} M_Sun) are less concentrated and not well-fit by simple models.
The age-size relation varies between ellipticals and S0s, challenging existing formation models.
Abstract
We provide fits to the distribution of galaxy luminosity, size, velocity dispersion and stellar mass as a function of concentration index C_r and morphological type in the SDSS. We also quantify how estimates of the fraction of `early' or `late' type galaxies depend on whether the samples were cut in color, concentration or light profile shape, and compare with similar estimates based on morphology. Our fits show that Es account for about 20% of the r-band luminosity density, rho_Lr, and 25% of the stellar mass density, rho_*; including S0s and Sas increases these numbers to 33% and 40%, and 50% and 60%, respectively. Summed over all galaxy types, we find rho_* ~ 3 * 10^8 M_Sun Mpc^{-3} at z ~ 0. This is in good agreement with expectations based on integrating the star formation history. However, compared to most previous work, we find an excess of objects at large masses, up to a…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
