Schemic Grothendieck rings and motivic rationality
Hans Schoutens

TL;DR
This paper introduces the schemic Grothendieck ring as a refined invariant that captures non-reduced structures and enables a motivic integration framework, leading to new proofs of rationality results in algebraic geometry.
Contribution
It develops the schemic Grothendieck ring, extending classical invariants, and provides a characteristic-free proof of the rationality of Igusa zeta series for certain hypersurfaces.
Findings
Defined the schemic Grothendieck ring incorporating non-reduced schemes.
Established a motivic integration approach using arc schemes.
Proved the rationality of geometric Igusa zeta series for specific hypersurfaces.
Abstract
We propose a suitable substitute for the classical Grothendieck ring of an algebraically closed field, in which any quasi-projective scheme is represented, while maintaining its non-reduced structure. This yields a more subtle invariant, called the schemic Grothendieck ring, in which we can formulate a form of integration resembling Kontsevich's motivic integration via arc schemes. In view of its more functorial properties, we can present a characteristic-free proof of the rationality of the geometric Igusa zeta series for certain hypersurfaces, thus generalizing the ground-breaking work on motivic integration by Denef and Loeser. The construction uses first-order formulae, and some infinitary versions, called formularies.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRings, Modules, and Algebras · Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory · Commutative Algebra and Its Applications
