Optimal Testing of Reed-Muller Codes

TL;DR

This paper provides an optimal analysis of the Gowers norm test for Reed-Muller codes, showing it effectively distinguishes functions close to degree d polynomials with a universal constant rejection probability.

Contribution

It offers a tight analysis of the Gowers norm test's rejection probability, improving understanding of its tolerance and implications for property testing.

Findings

Gowers norm test rejects functions Omega(2^{-d})-far with constant probability

The analysis yields a new understanding of the relationship between Gowers norm and polynomial correlation

Implications include improved XOR lemma parameters and a query hierarchy for affine-invariant properties

Abstract

We consider the problem of testing if a given function f : F_2^n -> F_2 is close to any degree d polynomial in n variables, also known as the Reed-Muller testing problem. The Gowers norm is based on a natural 2^{d+1}-query test for this property. Alon et al. [AKKLR05] rediscovered this test and showed that it accepts every degree d polynomial with probability 1, while it rejects functions that are Omega(1)-far with probability Omega(1/(d 2^{d})). We give an asymptotically optimal analysis of this test, and show that it rejects functions that are (even only) Omega(2^{-d})-far with Omega(1)-probability (so the rejection probability is a universal constant independent of d and n). This implies a tight relationship between the (d+1)st Gowers norm of a function and its maximal correlation with degree d polynomials, when the correlation is close to 1. Our proof works by induction on n and yields a new analysis of even the classical Blum-Luby-Rubinfeld [BLR93] linearity test, for the setting of functions mapping F_2^n to F_2. The optimality follows from a tighter analysis of counterexamples to the "inverse conjecture for the Gowers norm" constructed by [GT09,LMS08]. Our result has several implications. First, it shows that the Gowers norm test is tolerant, in that it also accepts close codewords. Second, it improves the parameters of an XOR lemma for polynomials given by Viola and Wigderson [VW07]. Third, it implies a "query hierarchy" result for property testing of affine-invariant properties. That is, for every function q(n), it gives an affine-invariant property that is testable with O(q(n))-queries, but not with o(q(n))-queries, complementing an analogous result of [GKNR09] for graph properties.