Geometric phases and hidden gauge symmetry
Kazuo Fujikawa

TL;DR
This paper reviews the second quantized approach to geometric phases, revealing a hidden gauge symmetry that unifies the understanding of adiabatic and non-adiabatic phases and analyzing the transition between them.
Contribution
It introduces a hidden local gauge symmetry in second quantization that unifies geometric phases and analyzes the adiabatic to non-adiabatic transition quantitatively.
Findings
The hidden gauge symmetry controls all known geometric phases.
The topology of Berry's phase is trivial and fragile against non-adiabatic deformation.
The formulation does not rely on the projective Hilbert space concept.
Abstract
The second quantized approach to geometric phases is reviewed. The second quantization generally induces a hidden local (time-dependent) gauge symmetry. This gauge symmetry defines the parallel transport and holonomy, and thus it controls all the known geometric phases, either adiabatic or non-adiabatic, in a unified manner. The transitional region from the adiabatic to non-adiabatic phases is thus analyzed in a quantitative way. It is then shown that the topology of the adiabatic Berry's phase is trivial in a precise sense and also the adiabatic phase is rather fragile against the non-adiabatic deformation. In this formulation, the notion such as the projective Hilbert space does not appear.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTopological Materials and Phenomena · Crystallography and Radiation Phenomena · Quantum Chromodynamics and Particle Interactions
