Why is $v_4/(v_2)^2$ larger than predicted by hydrodynamics?
Cl\'ement Gombeaud, Jean-Yves Ollitrault

TL;DR
This paper investigates why the ratio of fourth to second harmonic flow coefficients in heavy-ion collisions exceeds hydrodynamic predictions, attributing the discrepancy mainly to flow fluctuations and highlighting limitations of current models.
Contribution
It demonstrates that elliptic flow fluctuations largely explain the large $v_4/(v_2)^2$ ratio, but standard eccentricity fluctuation models fail in central collisions.
Findings
Flow fluctuations significantly increase the ratio.
Partial thermalization has a small effect.
Standard eccentricity models cannot explain central collision data.
Abstract
The second and fourth Fourier harmonics of the azimuthal distribution of particles, and , have been mesured in Au-Au collisions at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC). The ratio is significantly larger than predicted by hydrodynamics. Effects of partial thermalization are estimated on the basis of a transport calculation, and are shown to increase the ratio by a small amount. We argue that the large value of seen experimentally is mostly due to elliptic flow fluctuations. However, the standard model of eccentricity fluctuations is unable to explain the large magnitude of in central collisions.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
