How Massive are Massive Compact Galaxies?
Adam Muzzin (Yale), Pieter van Dokkum (Yale), Marijn Franx (Leiden),, Danilo Marchesini (Tufts), Mariska Kriek (Princeton), and Ivo Labb\'e (OCIW)

TL;DR
This study examines how assumptions in spectral energy distribution modeling influence stellar mass estimates of massive compact galaxies at z~2.3, revealing they are significantly smaller than local counterparts regardless of modeling choices.
Contribution
It systematically evaluates the impact of different SED modeling assumptions, including stellar populations and IMF, on mass estimates of high-redshift compact galaxies.
Findings
Mass estimates vary by up to 0.18 dex with different models.
Two-component models can increase mass estimates by 0.08 to 0.22 dex.
Galaxies are 3-9 times smaller than local mass-size relation, regardless of assumptions.
Abstract
Using a sample of nine massive compact galaxies at z ~ 2.3 with rest-frame optical spectroscopy and comprehensive U through 8um photometry we investigate how assumptions in SED modeling change the stellar mass estimates of these galaxies, and how this affects our interpretation of their size evolution. The SEDs are fit to Tau-models with a range of metallicities, dust laws, as well as different stellar population synthesis codes. These models indicate masses equal to, or slightly smaller than our default masses. The maximum difference is 0.16 dex for each parameter considered, and only 0.18 dex for the most extreme combination of parameters. Two-component populations with a maximally old stellar population superposed with a young component provide reasonable fits to these SEDs using the models of Bruzual & Charlot (2003); however, using models with updated treatment of TP-AGB stars the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
