Dust Production and Mass Loss in the Galactic Globular Cluster NGC 362
Martha L. Boyer (1), Iain McDonald (2), Jacco Th. van Loon (2), Karl, D. Gordon (1), Brian Babler (3), Miwa Block (4), Steve Bracker (3), Charles, Engelbracht (4), Joe Hora (5), Remy Indebetouw (6), Marilyn Meade (3),, Margaret Meixner (1), Karl Misselt (4)

TL;DR
This study uses Spitzer observations to analyze dust production and mass loss in NGC 362, revealing dust presence only in stars near the Red Giant Branch tip and identifying unexpected amorphous carbon dust in some stars.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed measurement of dust and gas mass-loss rates in NGC 362, highlighting the presence of amorphous carbon dust in oxygen-rich stars.
Findings
Dust detected only in stars near the Red Giant Branch tip.
Total cluster dust mass-loss rate estimated at 3.0(+2.0/-1.2) x 10^-9 solar masses/year.
Presence of amorphous carbon dust in some stars despite oxygen-rich chemistry.
Abstract
We investigate dust production and stellar mass loss in the Galactic globular cluster NGC 362. Due to its close proximity to the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC), NGC 362 was imaged with the IRAC and MIPS cameras onboard the Spitzer Space Telescope as part of the Surveying the Agents of Galaxy Evolution (SAGE-SMC) Spitzer Legacy program. We detect several cluster members near the tip of the Red Giant Branch that exhibit infrared excesses indicative of circumstellar dust and find that dust is not present in measurable quantities in stars below the tip of the Red Giant Branch. We modeled the spectral energy distribution (SED) of the stars with the strongest IR excess and find a total cluster dust mass-loss rate of 3.0(+2.0/-1.2) x 10^-9 solar masses per year, corresponding to a gas mass-loss rate of 8.6(+5.6/-3.4) x 10^-6 solar masses per year, assuming [Fe/H] = -1.16. This mass loss is in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
