Crossed Andreev reflection versus electron transfer in graphene nanoribbons
H{\aa}vard Haugen, Daniel Huertas-Hernando, Arne Brataas, Xavier, Waintal

TL;DR
This paper analyzes transport phenomena in three-terminal graphene nanoribbon devices, revealing how device symmetry influences the dominance of electron transfer or crossed Andreev reflection, with implications for quantum transport control.
Contribution
It provides analytical and numerical insights into ET and CAR in symmetric and asymmetric graphene nanoribbon devices, highlighting the role of zero-energy modes.
Findings
ET dominates in symmetric devices
CAR can dominate in asymmetric devices
Zero-energy modes are crucial for transport behavior
Abstract
We investigate the transport properties of three-terminal graphene devices, where one terminal is superconducting and two are normal metals. The terminals are connected by nanoribbons. Electron transfer (ET) and crossed Andreev reflection (CAR) are identified via the non-local signal between the two normal terminals. Analytical expressions for ET and CAR in symmetric devices are found. We compute ET and CAR numerically for asymmetric devices. ET dominates CAR in symmetric devices, but CAR can dominate ET in asymmetric devices, where only the zero-energy modes of the zigzag nanoribbons contribute to the transport.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
