Contact and Friction of Nano-Asperities: Effects of Adsorbed Monolayers

TL;DR

This study uses molecular dynamics simulations to analyze how adsorbed monolayers affect contact mechanics and friction between nano-scale asperities, revealing complex behaviors and deviations from continuum models.

Contribution

It demonstrates that adsorbed monolayers influence contact variability and frictional behavior, providing new insights into nanoscale contact mechanics with fluid films.

Findings

Adsorbed monolayers increase deviations from continuum theory.

Friction rises linearly with load at small loads.

Contact area measures vary with pressure distribution and atom contact counts.

Abstract

Molecular dynamics simulations are used to study contact between a rigid, nonadhesive, spherical tip with radius of order 30nm and a flat elastic substrate covered with a fluid monolayer of adsorbed chain molecules. Previous studies of bare surfaces showed that the atomic scale deviations from a sphere that are present on any tip constructed from discrete atoms lead to significant deviations from continuum theory and dramatic variability in friction forces. Introducing an adsorbed monolayer leads to larger deviations from continuum theory, but decreases the variations between tips with different atomic structure. Although the film is fluid, it remains in the contact and behaves qualitatively like a thin elastic coating except for certain tips at high loads. Measures of the contact area based on the moments or outer limits of the pressure distribution and on counting contacting atoms are compared. The number of tip atoms making contact in a time interval grows as a power of the interval when the film is present and logarithmically with the interval for bare surfaces. Friction is measured by displacing the tip at a constant velocity or pulling the tip with a spring. Both static and kinetic friction rise linearly with load at small loads. Transitions in the state of the film lead to nonlinear behavior at large loads. The friction is less clearly correlated with contact area than load.