Evolution of magnetic phases and orbital occupation in (SrMnO3)n/(LaMnO3)2n superlattices
C. Aruta, C. Adamo, A. Galdi, P. Orgiani, V. Bisogni, N. B. Brookes,, J. C. Cezar, P. Thakur, C. A. Perroni, G. De Filippis, V. Cataudella, D. G., Schlom, L. Maritato, and G. Ghiringhelli

TL;DR
This study investigates how magnetic phases and orbital occupations evolve in (SrMnO3)n/(LaMnO3)2n superlattices, revealing interface-driven ferromagnetism and orbital preferences influenced by strain and layer thickness.
Contribution
It provides new insights into the interface-induced magnetic and orbital modifications in superlattices, combining experimental spectroscopy with theoretical calculations.
Findings
Charge redistribution favors in-plane ferromagnetism and specific orbital occupation.
Far from interfaces, antiferromagnetism and different orbital occupation dominate.
Layer thickness influences the magnetic order and orbital occupation distribution.
Abstract
The magnetic and electronic modifications induced at the interfaces in (SrMnO)/(LaMnO) superlattices have been investigated by linear and circular magnetic dichroism in the Mn L x-ray absorption spectra. Together with theoretical calculations, our data demonstrate that the charge redistribution across interfaces favors in-plane ferromagnetic (FM) order and orbital occupation, in agreement with the average strain. Far from interfaces, inside LaMnO, electron localization and local strain favor antiferromagnetism (AFM) and orbital occupation. For the high density of interfacial planes ultimately leads to dominant FM order forcing the residual AFM phase to be in-plane too, while for the FM layers are separated by AFM regions having out-of-plane spin orientation.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
