The Behavior of Novae Light Curves Before Eruption
Andrew C. Collazzi, Bradley E. Schaefer, Limin Xiao, Ashley Pagnotta,, Peter Kroll, Klaus Lochel, Arne A. Henden

TL;DR
This study revisits and tests previous claims about pre-eruption behavior in novae by analyzing archival data, finding most earlier results were incorrect, but confirming some cases of pre-eruption rises and significant post-eruption brightness changes.
Contribution
It provides a revised analysis of nova pre-eruption behavior using archival data, correcting past misconceptions and identifying new cases of significant brightness changes.
Findings
Most claimed pre-eruption rises were due to errors.
Confirmed two cases of pre-eruption rises in novae.
Identified five novae with post-eruption brightness over ten times pre-eruption levels.
Abstract
In 1975, E. R. Robinson conducted the hallmark study of the behavior of classical nova light curves before eruption, and this work has now become part of the standard knowledge of novae. He made three points; that 5 out of 11 novae showed pre-eruption rises in the years before eruption, that one nova (V446 Her) showed drastic changes in the variability across eruptions, and that all but one of the novae (excepting BT Mon) have the same quiescent magnitudes before and after the outburst. This work has not been tested since it came out. We have now tested these results by going back to the original archival photographic plates and measuring large numbers of pre-eruption magnitudes for many novae using comparison stars on a modern magnitude scale. We find in particular that four out of five claimed pre-eruption rises are due to simple mistakes in the old literature, that V446 Her has the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
