The relative growth of Optical and Radio Quasars in SDSS
Francesco Shankar (1), Gregory R. Sivakoff (2), Marianne Vestergaard, (3,5), and Xinyu Dai (4) ((1) MPA, (2) U. Virginia, (3) Dark Cosmology, Centre, U. Copenhagen, (4) U. Michigan, (5) Steward Observatory, U. Arizona)

TL;DR
This study compares the evolution of optical and radio quasars using SDSS data, revealing distinct growth patterns, accretion rates, and black hole masses over cosmic time, and suggesting that radio activity may be driven by properties like black hole spin.
Contribution
It provides the first detailed comparison of accretion histories and black hole growth between optical and radio quasars across different redshifts.
Findings
Radio quasars have higher mean Eddington ratios at z > 2.
Radio quasars are less massive than optical quasars at high redshift but become more massive at lower redshift.
Radio quasars grow only modestly since z ~ 4, with lower mass BHs less likely to be radio loud.
Abstract
We cross-correlate the SDSS DR3 quasar sample with FIRST and the Vestergaard et al. black hole (BH) mass sample to compare the mean accretion histories of optical and radio quasars. We find significant statistical evidence that radio quasars have a higher mean Eddington ratio Lambda at z > 2 with respect to optical quasars, while the situation is clearly reverse at z < 1. At z > 2 radio quasars happen to be less massive than optical quasars; however, as redshift decreases radio quasars appear in increasingly more massive BHs with respect to optical quasars. These two trends imply that radio sources are not a mere random subsample of optical quasars. No clear correlation between radio activity and BH mass and/or accretion rate is evident from our data, pointing to other BH properties, possibly the spin, as the driver of radio activity. We have checked that our main results do not depend…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
