The Evolution of Overconfidence
Dominic D. P. Johnson, James H. Fowler

TL;DR
This paper presents an evolutionary model demonstrating that overconfidence can maximize individual fitness and become a stable strategy in populations, explaining its prevalence despite potential negative consequences.
Contribution
It introduces a novel evolutionary framework showing how overconfidence can be advantageous and stable, contrasting with traditional rational strategies.
Findings
Overconfidence maximizes individual fitness in contested environments.
Populations tend to evolve towards overconfidence when resource benefits outweigh competition costs.
Unbiased strategies are only stable under limited conditions.
Abstract
Confidence is an essential ingredient of success in a wide range of domains ranging from job performance and mental health, to sports, business, and combat. Some authors have suggested that not just confidence but overconfidence-believing you are better than you are in reality-is advantageous because it serves to increase ambition, morale, resolve, persistence, or the credibility of bluffing, generating a self-fulfilling prophecy in which exaggerated confidence actually increases the probability of success. However, overconfidence also leads to faulty assessments, unrealistic expectations, and hazardous decisions, so it remains a puzzle how such a false belief could evolve or remain stable in a population of competing strategies that include accurate, unbiased beliefs. Here, we present an evolutionary model showing that, counter-intuitively, overconfidence maximizes individual fitness…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
