Utility Function and Optimum Consumption in the models with Habit Formation and Catching up with the Joneses
Roman Naryshkin, Matt Davison

TL;DR
This paper examines utility functions in habit formation and catching up with the Joneses models, proposing new specifications that produce more realistic consumption behaviors and highlighting differences in utility functions used.
Contribution
It introduces theoretically justified utility functions for habit formation and CuJ models, improving the plausibility of optimal consumption time series.
Findings
Habit formation utility should use power CRRA, unlike exponential CARA for CuJ.
Many existing models produce unrealistic consumption patterns.
Proposed utility specifications lead to more reasonable consumption dynamics.
Abstract
This paper analyzes popular time-nonseparable utility functions that describe "habit formation" consumer preferences comparing current consumption with the time averaged past consumption of the same individual and "catching up with the Joneses" (CuJ) models comparing individual consumption with a cross-sectional average consumption level. Few of these models give reasonable optimum consumption time series. We introduce theoretically justified utility specifications leading to a plausible consumption behavior to show that habit formation preferences must be described by a power CRRA utility function different from the exponential CARA used for CuJ.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEconomic theories and models · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
