Torsion and Open Book Decompositions
John B. Etnyre, David Shea Vela-Vick

TL;DR
This paper explores the properties of open book decompositions in contact 3-manifolds, demonstrating that their binding complements lack Giroux torsion and that a certain invariant of the binding is non-zero, revealing new structural insights.
Contribution
It establishes a connection between open book decompositions and Giroux torsion, and proves the non-vanishing of a sutured Heegaard-Floer invariant for bindings.
Findings
Complement of the binding has no Giroux torsion.
The sutured Heegaard-Floer c-bar invariant of the binding is non-zero.
Provides new structural constraints on contact 3-manifolds with open books.
Abstract
We show that if (B,\pi) is an open book decomposition of a contact 3-manifold (Y,\xi), then the complement of the binding B has no Giroux torsion. We also prove the sutured Heegaard-Floer c-bar invariant of the binding of an open book is non-zero.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGeometric and Algebraic Topology · Logic, programming, and type systems · semigroups and automata theory
