Fundamental Theoretical Bias in Gravitational Wave Astrophysics and the Parameterized Post-Einsteinian Framework
Nicolas Yunes, Frans Pretorius

TL;DR
This paper discusses the potential bias in gravitational wave analysis caused by assuming general relativity is correct in all regimes, and proposes a parameterized framework to test for deviations in strong-field gravity.
Contribution
It introduces the parameterized post-Einsteinian framework to incorporate alternative theories of gravity into waveform templates for gravitational wave detection.
Findings
Constructed specific post-Einsteinian templates for binary coalescence.
Framework allows data to test for deviations from general relativity.
Addresses systematic errors in gravitational wave parameter estimation.
Abstract
We consider the concept of fundamental bias in gravitational wave astrophysics as the assumption that general relativity is the correct theory of gravity during the entire wave-generation and propagation regime. Such an assumption is valid in the weak field, as verified by precision experiments and observations, but it need not hold in the dynamical strong-field regime where tests are lacking. Fundamental bias can cause systematic errors in the detection and parameter estimation of signals, which can lead to a mischaracterization of the universe through incorrect inferences about source event rates and populations. We propose a remedy through the introduction of the parameterized post-Einsteinian framework, which consists of the enhancement of waveform templates via the inclusion of post-Einsteinian parameters. These parameters would ostensibly be designed to interpolate between…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
