When Should We Treat Galaxies as Isolated?
Philip F. Hopkins (1), Dusan Keres (2), Chung-Pei Ma (1), Eliot, Quataert (1) ((1) Berkeley, (2) CfA)

TL;DR
This paper examines when galaxies can be considered isolated by comparing secular evolution timescales to cosmological accretion and merger rates, highlighting the importance of perturbation amplitude and galaxy properties.
Contribution
It provides simple scalings and criteria to determine when galaxy evolution can be approximated as isolated, considering factors like perturbation amplitude, mass, redshift, and disk stability.
Findings
Perturbation amplitudes of 0.01-0.1 are critical for secular evolution.
Disks are not isolated at very small or very large perturbation amplitudes.
Maximum bar/mode lifetime is approximately 0.1/H(z).
Abstract
Traditionally, secular evolution is defined as evolution of systems where the internal growth of structure and instabilities dominates the growth via external drivers (e.g. accretion/mergers). Most study has focused on 'isolated' galaxies, where seed asymmetries may represent realistic cosmological substructure, but subsequent evolution ignores galaxy growth. Large-scale modes in the disk then grow on a timescale of order a disk rotation period (0.1-1 Gyr). If, however, galaxies evolve cosmologically on a shorter timescale, then it may not be appropriate to consider them 'isolated.' We outline simple scalings to ask whether the timescale for secular evolution is shorter than the timescale for cosmological accretion and mergers. This is the case in a narrow, but important range of perturbation amplitudes corresponding to substructure or mode/bar fractional amplitudes 0.01-0.1, a range of…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
