Network synchronization landscape reveals compensatory structures, quantization, and the positive effect of negative interactions
Takashi Nishikawa, Adilson E. Motter

TL;DR
This paper reveals that optimal network synchronization is achieved through quantized total interaction strength and the strategic use of negative interactions, challenging the idea that more connections always improve synchronization.
Contribution
It introduces a novel framework showing that networks with quantized interaction strength and negative links can optimize synchronization, extending previous metabolic network findings.
Findings
Networks with optimal synchronization have quantized total interaction strength.
Negative interactions and link removals can enhance synchronization.
Optimal networks can have arbitrary complexity with constrained total interaction.
Abstract
Synchronization, in which individual dynamical units keep in pace with each other in a decentralized fashion, depends both on the dynamical units and on the properties of the interaction network. Yet, the role played by the network has resisted comprehensive characterization within the prevailing paradigm that interactions facilitating pair-wise synchronization also facilitate collective synchronization. Here we challenge this paradigm and show that networks with best complete synchronization, least coupling cost, and maximum dynamical robustness, have arbitrary complexity but quantized total interaction strength that constrains the allowed number of connections. It stems from this characterization that negative interactions as well as link removals can be used to systematically improve and optimize synchronization properties in both directed and undirected networks. These results…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
