New Solar Composition: The Problem With Solar Models Revisited
Aldo Serenelli (Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics), Sarbani Basu, (Yale University), Jason W. Ferguson (Wichita State University), Martin, Asplund (Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics)

TL;DR
This paper revisits solar models using recent abundance measurements, revealing conflicts with helioseismology data and suggesting modifications to radiative opacities to reconcile models with observations.
Contribution
It provides updated solar models with new abundances, quantifies the opacity adjustments needed, and analyzes the impact on neutrino flux predictions.
Findings
Models with recent abundances conflict with helioseismology data.
A maximum 15% opacity increase at the convective zone base is needed.
Predicted neutrino fluxes for $^{13}$N and $^{15}$O increase by ~10%.
Abstract
We construct updated solar models with different sets of solar abundances, including the most recent determinations by Asplund et al. (2009). The latter work predicts a larger () solar metallicity compared to previous measurements by the same authors but significantly lower () than the recommended value from a decade ago by Grevesse & Sauval (1998). We compare the results of our models with determinations of the solar structure inferred through helioseismology measurements. The model that uses the most recent solar abundance determinations predicts the base of the solar convective envelope to be located at and a surface helium mass fraction of . These results are in conflict with helioseismology data ( and ) at 5 and 11 levels…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Code & Models
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
