Discriminating Between the Physical Processes that Drive Spheroid Size Evolution

TL;DR

This paper investigates the physical processes driving the size evolution of spheroids in massive galaxies, finding that dry mergers are the dominant factor, with other effects contributing modestly, and compares models with observations and simulations.

Contribution

It identifies dry mergers as the primary mechanism for spheroid size growth and tests various models against observations and simulations, highlighting the dominant role of mergers.

Findings

Dry mergers are consistent with observed size evolution.

Other effects contribute approximately 20% each to size growth.

Simulations incorporating multiple effects align with observational constraints.

Abstract

Massive galaxies at high-z have smaller effective radii than those today, but similar central densities. Their size growth therefore relates primarily to the evolving abundance of low-density material. Various models have been proposed to explain this evolution, which have different implications for galaxy, star, and BH formation. We compile observations of spheroid properties as a function of redshift and use them to test proposed models. Evolution in progenitor gas-richness with redshift gives rise to initial formation of smaller spheroids at high-z. These systems can then evolve in apparent or physical size via several channels: (1) equal-density 'dry' mergers, (2) later major or minor 'dry' mergers with less-dense galaxies, (3) adiabatic expansion, (4) evolution in stellar populations & mass-to-light-ratio gradients, (5) age-dependent bias in stellar mass estimators, (6) observational fitting/selection effects. If any one of these is tuned to explain observed size evolution, they make distinct predictions for evolution in other galaxy properties. Only model (2) is consistent with observations as a dominant effect. It is the only model which allows for an increase in M_BH/M_bulge with redshift. Still, the amount of merging needed is larger than that observed or predicted. We therefore compare cosmologically motivated simulations, in which all these effects occur, & show they are consistent with all the observational constraints. Effect (2), which builds up an extended low-density envelope, does dominate the evolution, but effects 1,3,4, & 6 each contribute ~20% to the size evolution (a net factor ~2). This naturally also predicts evolution in M_BH-sigma similar to that observed.