Testing GRB models with the afterglow of GRB 090102
B. Gendre (1), A. Klotz (2,3), E. Palazzi (4), T. Kruhler (5,6), S., Covino (7), P. Afonso (5), L.A. Antonelli (8), J.L. Atteia (9), P. D'Avanzo, (7,10), M. Boer (2), J. Greiner (5), S. Klose (11) ((1) LAM, (2) OHP, (3), CESR, (4) IASF-Bologna/INAF, (5) MPE

TL;DR
This paper analyzes the afterglow of GRB 090102 across optical and X-ray wavelengths, revealing unusual light curve features that challenge standard fireball models and require complex explanations.
Contribution
It provides comprehensive multi-wavelength observations of GRB 090102's afterglow and evaluates various models, highlighting the need for fine-tuning to explain the data.
Findings
X-ray afterglow shows a steady decline without breaks
Optical light curve flattens after 1 ks, with no further breaks up to 10 days
Standard fireball model cannot fully explain the observed data
Abstract
We present the observations of the afterglow of gamma-ray burst GRB 090102. Optical data taken by the TAROT, REM, GROND, together with publicly available data from Palomar, IAC and NOT telescopes, and X-ray data taken by the XRT instrument on board the Swift spacecraft were used. This event features an unusual light curve. In X-rays, it presents a constant decrease with no hint of temporal break from 0.005 to 6 days after the burst. In the optical, the light curve presents a flattening after 1 ks. Before this break, the optical light curve is steeper than that of the X-ray. In the optical, no further break is observed up to 10 days after the burst. We failed to explain these observations in light of the standard fireball model. Several other models, including the cannonball model were investigated. The explanation of the broad band data by any model requires some fine tuning when taking…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
