n-Opposition theory to structure debates
Jean Sallantin (LIRMM), Antoine Seilles (LIRMM)

TL;DR
This paper explores using n-opposition theory, including the square of oppositions, to structure and organize online debates logically, supported by three experimental studies.
Contribution
It introduces a novel approach to structuring web debates using n-opposition theory and provides experimental validation of this method.
Findings
Effective organization of debates using n-opposition structures
Positive experimental results on web-based debate structuring
Insights into the role of logical opposition in online discussions
Abstract
2007 was the first international congress on the ?square of oppositions?. A first attempt to structure debate using n-opposition theory was presented along with the results of a first experiment on the web. Our proposal for this paper is to define relations between arguments through a structure of opposition (square of oppositions is one structure of opposition). We will be trying to answer the following questions: How to organize debates on the web 2.0? How to structure them in a logical way? What is the role of n-opposition theory, in this context? We present in this paper results of three experiments (Betapolitique 2007, ECAP 2008, Intermed 2008).
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsSocial Media and Politics · Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies
