Response to "Discovery of the element with atomic number 112" by Robert C. Barber, Heinz W. Gaggeler, Paul J. Karol, Hiromichi Nakahara, Emanuele Vardaci and Erich Vogt (PAC-REP-08-03-05)
Amnon Marinov, Dietmar Kolb, Jesse L. Weil

TL;DR
This paper critiques the Joint Working Party's assignment of the discovery of element 112 to recent work, arguing that earlier data from 1971 provides compelling evidence for its discovery, including mass measurements and chemical properties.
Contribution
It challenges the official discovery claim by highlighting overlooked data from 1971 and argues for considering long-lived isomeric states in the interpretation of superheavy element evidence.
Findings
1971 data shows evidence of element 112 with mass 272-273
Long-lived isomeric states are plausible and supported by recent isotope evidence
The JWP's rejection of earlier data and isomeric states is unjustified
Abstract
Based on two alpha-particle chains the Joint Working Party (JWP) Report assigns the priority for discovering element 112 to work done in 1996 and 2002 at GSI, Darmstadt. By doing this it ignores the data presented to the JWP about the discovery of this element already back in 1971 by Marinov et al. In those measurements about one hundred fission fragments were observed from two Hg sources separated from two W targets irradiated with 24 GeV protons. Furthermore, the masses of the fissioning species were measured and interpreted as being due to the atom and four different molecules of element 112 with atomic mass number 272-273. By ignoring these data the JWP disregards the facts that mass measurement is considered by the Transfermium Working Group (TWG) report as an "excellent criterion" and that "chemical methods can yield excellent assignment criteria". It is shown below that all the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsNuclear physics research studies · Astronomical and nuclear sciences · Nuclear Physics and Applications
