Adaptive versus non-adaptive strategies for quantum channel discrimination
Aram W. Harrow, Avinatan Hassidim, Debbie W. Leung, John Watrous

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that adaptive strategies can perfectly discriminate certain quantum channels with fewer evaluations than any non-adaptive approach, highlighting the advantage of adaptivity in quantum channel discrimination.
Contribution
The paper provides a simple example showing the superiority of adaptive strategies over non-adaptive ones in quantum channel discrimination, especially for entanglement-breaking channels.
Findings
Adaptive strategy achieves perfect discrimination with two evaluations.
No finite non-adaptive strategy can perfectly discriminate the channels.
Adaptive methods outperform non-adaptive methods in this quantum task.
Abstract
We provide a simple example that illustrates the advantage of adaptive over non-adaptive strategies for quantum channel discrimination. In particular, we give a pair of entanglement-breaking channels that can be perfectly discriminated by means of an adaptive strategy that requires just two channel evaluations, but for which no non-adaptive strategy can give a perfect discrimination using any finite number of channel evaluations.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsQuantum Information and Cryptography
