Revisiting Pollock's Drip Paintings
Katherine Jones-Smith, Harsh Mathur

TL;DR
This paper critically examines the fractal analysis of Jackson Pollock's drip paintings, finding that their fractal properties are limited and can be artificially generated, thus questioning the reliability of fractal analysis for authentication.
Contribution
The study demonstrates that Pollock's paintings do not exhibit true fractal properties and that similar patterns can be produced by simple random processes, challenging previous authentication methods.
Findings
Paintings show limited fractal characteristics over small ranges.
Fractal features can be generated by simple random motion.
Fractal analysis alone is insufficient for authentication.
Abstract
We investigate the contentions that Jackson Pollock's drip paintings are fractals produced by the artist's Levy distributed motion and that fractal analysis may be used to authenticate works of uncertain provenance[1-5]. We find that the paintings exhibit fractal characteristics over too small a range to be usefully considered as fractal; their limited fractal characteristics are easily generated without Levy motion, both by freehand drawing and gaussian random motion. Several problems must therefore be addressed before fractal analysis can be used to authenticate paintings.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAesthetic Perception and Analysis
