The Heating of Test Particles in Numerical Simulations of Alfvenic Turbulence
Remi Lehe, Ian J. Parrish, Eliot Quataert

TL;DR
This study investigates how charged particles are heated in 3D MHD turbulence simulations, revealing different heating mechanisms depending on particle gyrofrequency and showing that turbulence can cause significant parallel heating, with implications for solar wind and astrophysics.
Contribution
The paper provides new insights into particle heating mechanisms in Alfvenic turbulence, highlighting the role of resonance broadening and the impact of turbulence scales on heating efficiency.
Findings
Particles with gyrofrequency near turbulent fluctuation frequency undergo strong perpendicular heating.
Particles with large gyrofrequency experience strong parallel heating.
Turbulence produces significant parallel heating but limited perpendicular heating above proton Larmor radius.
Abstract
We study the heating of charged test particles in three-dimensional numerical simulations of weakly compressible magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) turbulence (``Alfvenic turbulence''); these results are relevant to particle heating and acceleration in the solar wind, solar flares, accretion disks onto black holes, and other astrophysics and heliospheric environments. The physics of particle heating depends on whether the gyrofrequency of a particle is comparable to the frequency of a turbulent fluctuation that is resolved on the computational domain. Particles with these frequencies nearly equal undergo strong perpendicular heating (relative to the local magnetic field) and pitch angle scattering. By contrast, particles with large gyrofrequency undergo strong parallel heating. Simulations with a finite resistivity produce additional parallel heating due to parallel electric fields in…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
