Upper Limits on X-ray Emission from Two Rotating Radio Transients

TL;DR

This study used Chandra observations to search for X-ray emissions from two RRATs, setting upper limits on their X-ray luminosity and temperature, which suggests they may have cooled beyond detectable levels or emit differently than similar neutron stars.

Contribution

First deep X-ray search for RRATs J0847-4316 and J1846-0257, establishing upper limits on their X-ray emission and temperature, highlighting differences from previously observed RRATs.

Findings

No X-ray emission detected from the two RRATs.

Derived temperature limits of 77 eV and 91 eV for the sources.

Luminosity limits below that of J1819-1458, indicating possible cooling.

Abstract

X-ray emission from the enigmatic Rotating RAdio Transients (RRATs) offers a vital clue to understanding these objects and how they relate to the greater neutron star population. An X-ray counterpart to J1819-1458 is known, and its properties are similar to those of other middle-aged (0.1 Myr) neutron stars. We have searched for X-ray emission with Chandra/ACIS at the positions of two RRATs with arcsecond (or better) localisation, J0847-4316 and J1846-0257. Despite deep searches (especially for J1847-0257) we did not detect any emission with 0.3-8 keV count-rate limits of 1 counts/ks and 0.068 counts/ks, respectively, at 3sigma confidence. Assuming thermal emission similar to that seen from J1819-1458 (a blackbody with radius of approximately 20 km), we derive effective temperature limits of 77 eV and 91 eV for the nominal values of the distances and column densities to both sources, although both of those quantities are highly uncertain and correlated. If we instead fix the temperature of the emission (a blackbody with kT=0.14 keV), we derive unabsorbed luminosity limits in the 0.3-8 keV range of 1e32 erg/s and 3e32 erg/s. These limits are considerably below the luminosity of J1819-1458 (4e33 erg/s), suggesting that RRATs J0847-4316 and J1846-0257 have cooled beyond the point of visibility (plausible given the differences in characteristic age). However, as we have not detected X-ray emission, it may also be that the emission from RRATs J0847-4316 and J1846-0257 has a different character from that of J1819-1458. The two non-detections may prove a counterpoint to J1819-1458, but more detections are certainly needed before we can begin to derive general X-ray emission properties for the RRAT populations.