Transverse masses and kinematic constraints: from the boundary to the crease
Alan J. Barr, Ben Gripaios, Christopher G. Lester

TL;DR
This paper revisits the kinematic variable m_T2, providing a new boundary-based definition that simplifies understanding, generalizes to complex cases, and offers explicit formulas useful for mass measurements and likelihood techniques.
Contribution
It generalizes the boundary definition of m_T2 and related variables, simplifying proofs and enabling new explicit formulas for non-identical particles and inverse calculations.
Findings
Reformulation of m_T2 as a boundary of kinematically consistent regions
Simplified proofs of properties like kink and crease structures
New explicit definitions and inverses for generalized mass variables
Abstract
We re-examine the kinematic variable m_T2 and its relatives in the light of recent work by Cheng and Han. Their proof that m_T2 admits an equivalent, but implicit, definition as the `boundary of the region of parent and daughter masses that is kinematically consistent with the event hypothesis' is far-reaching in its consequences. We generalize their result both to simpler cases (m_T, the transverse mass) and to more complex cases (m_TGen). We further note that it is possible to re-cast many existing and unpleasant proofs (e.g. those relating to the existence or properties of "kink" and "crease" structures in m_T2) into almost trivial forms by using the alternative definition. Not only does this allow us to gain better understanding of those existing results, but it also allows us to write down new (and more or less explicit) definitions of (a) the variable that naturally generalizes…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
