A relative theory of universal central extensions
Jose Manuel Casas, Tim Van der Linden

TL;DR
This paper develops a unified, relative framework for universal central extensions within semi-abelian categories, generalizing classical results and exploring conditions on the composition of such extensions.
Contribution
It introduces a relative theory of universal central extensions based on Birkhoff subcategories, unifying various classical and recent results in a single conceptual framework.
Findings
Unified classical and new results in a single framework
Identified conditions for composition of central extensions
Provided examples of categories satisfying or not satisfying these conditions
Abstract
Basing ourselves on Janelidze and Kelly's general notion of central extension, we study universal central extensions in the context of semi-abelian categories. Thus we unify classical, recent and new results in one conceptual framework. The theory we develop is relative to a chosen Birkhoff subcategory of the category considered: for instance, we consider groups vs. abelian groups, Lie algebras vs. vector spaces, precrossed modules vs. crossed modules and Leibniz algebras vs. Lie algebras. We consider a fundamental condition on composition of central extensions and give examples of categories which do, or do not, satisfy this condition.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsAdvanced Topics in Algebra · Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology · Algebraic structures and combinatorial models
