On Tensorial Concomitants and the Non-Existence of a Gravitational Stress-Energy Tensor
Erik Curiel

TL;DR
This paper demonstrates that under natural conditions, a localized gravitational stress-energy tensor cannot exist in general relativity, implying gravitational energy is inherently non-local.
Contribution
It provides a novel tensorial analysis showing the non-existence of a gravitational stress-energy tensor in general relativity, challenging traditional folklore.
Findings
No tensor can represent gravitational stress-energy under certain conditions.
Gravitational energy in general relativity is necessarily non-local.
Analysis of jet bundles of Lorentz metrics offers new mathematical insights.
Abstract
The question of the existence of gravitational stress-energy in general relativity has exercised investigators in the field since the inception of the theory. Folklore has it that no adequate definition of a localized gravitational stress-energetic quantity can be given. Most arguments to that effect invoke one version or another of the Principle of Equivalence. I argue that not only are such arguments of necessity vague and hand-waving but, worse, are beside the point and do not address the heart of the issue. Based on a novel analysis of what it may mean for one tensor to depend in the proper way on another, I prove that, under certain natural conditions, there can be no tensor whose interpretation could be that it represents gravitational stress-energy in general relativity. It follows that gravitational energy, such as it is in general relativity, is necessarily non-local. Along the…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCosmology and Gravitation Theories · Black Holes and Theoretical Physics · Advanced Differential Geometry Research
