Embedding Versus Immersion in General Relativity
Edmundo M. Monte

TL;DR
This paper examines the differences between embedding and immersion of space-times in higher dimensions, critiques Kasner's classical Schwarzschild immersion for not preserving causal structure, and discusses the physical implications.
Contribution
It clarifies the distinction between immersion and embedding in general relativity and highlights limitations of Kasner's Schwarzschild model regarding causal structure preservation.
Findings
Kasner's Schwarzschild immersion does not preserve causal structure
Embedding and immersion are conceptually distinct in space-time models
Physical adequacy of space-time immersions is questioned
Abstract
We briefly discuss the concepts of immersion and embedding of space-times in higher-dimensional spaces. We revisit the classical work by Kasner in which he constructs a model of immersion of the Schwarzschild exterior solution into a six-dimensional pseudo-Euclidean manifold. We show that, from a physical point of view, this model is not entirely satisfactory since the causal structure of the immersed space-time is not preserved by the immersion.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
