On the possible exceptions for the transcendence of the log-gamma function at rational entries
F. M. S. Lima

TL;DR
None
Contribution
None
Abstract
In a recent work [JNT \textbf{129}, 2154 (2009)], Gun and co-workers have claimed that the number , being a rational number between and , is transcendental with at most \emph{one} possible exception, but the proof presented there in that work is \emph{incorrect}. Here in this paper, I point out the mistake they committed and I present a theorem that establishes the transcendence of those numbers with at most \emph{two} possible exceptions. As a consequence, I make use of the reflection property of this function to establish a criteria for the transcendence of , a number whose irrationality is not proved yet. This has an interesting consequence for the transcendence of the product , another number whose irrationality remains unproven.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMathematical and Theoretical Analysis · History and Theory of Mathematics · Analytic Number Theory Research
