A bias correction for the minimum error rate in cross-validation
Ryan J. Tibshirani, Robert Tibshirani

TL;DR
This paper introduces a simple bias correction method for the minimum error rate in cross-validation, improving the accuracy of test error estimates without significant additional computation.
Contribution
It proposes a novel bias estimation technique for cross-validation error minima, enhancing model tuning reliability in supervised learning.
Findings
Bias correction improves test error estimation accuracy.
Method performs well across various classifiers and settings.
Requires minimal additional computational effort.
Abstract
Tuning parameters in supervised learning problems are often estimated by cross-validation. The minimum value of the cross-validation error can be biased downward as an estimate of the test error at that same value of the tuning parameter. We propose a simple method for the estimation of this bias that uses information from the cross-validation process. As a result, it requires essentially no additional computation. We apply our bias estimate to a number of popular classifiers in various settings, and examine its performance.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
