Comparison of Recent SnIa datasets
J. C. Bueno Sanchez, S. Nesseris, L. Perivolaropoulos

TL;DR
This paper evaluates and ranks six recent Type Ia supernova datasets based on their effectiveness in constraining dark energy parameters, their consistency with the cosmological constant, and their agreement with standard cosmological rulers, revealing insights into dataset reliability and internal consistency.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive ranking of recent SnIa datasets using multiple criteria and introduces a new statistic for assessing their internal consistency.
Findings
Higher number of supernovae increases the Figure of Merit.
Standard rulers outperform supernova datasets in constraining dark energy.
Including the Gold06 dataset reduces overall internal consistency.
Abstract
We rank the six latest Type Ia supernova (SnIa) datasets (Constitution (C), Union (U), ESSENCE (Davis) (E), Gold06 (G), SNLS 1yr (S) and SDSS-II (D)) in the context of the Chevalier-Polarski-Linder (CPL) parametrization , according to their Figure of Merit (FoM), their consistency with the cosmological constant (CDM), their consistency with standard rulers (Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) and Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO)) and their mutual consistency. We find a significant improvement of the FoM (defined as the inverse area of the 95.4% parameter contour) with the number of SnIa of these datasets ((C) highest FoM, (U), (G), (D), (E), (S) lowest FoM). Standard rulers (CMB+BAO) have a better FoM by about a factor of 3, compared to the highest FoM SnIa dataset (C). We also find that the ranking sequence based on consistency with CDM is…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
