Unitary equivalence of a matrix to its transpose
Stephan Ramon Garcia, James E. Tener

TL;DR
This paper investigates the conditions under which complex matrices are unitarily equivalent to their transpose, revealing size-dependent differences in their canonical forms and challenging previous assumptions for larger matrices.
Contribution
It provides a canonical decomposition for matrices unitarily equivalent to their transpose and shows the failure of a naive equivalence assertion for matrices of size 8x8 and larger.
Findings
The canonical decomposition for UET matrices is established.
The naive equivalence to complex symmetric matrices holds only for matrices 7x7 or smaller.
The equivalence fails for matrices 8x8 and larger.
Abstract
Motivated by a problem of Halmos, we obtain a canonical decomposition for complex matrices which are unitarily equivalent to their transpose (UET). Surprisingly, the naive assertion that a matrix is UET if and only if it is unitarily equivalent to a complex symmetric matrix (i.e., ) holds for matrices 7x7 and smaller, but fails for matrices 8x8 and larger.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMatrix Theory and Algorithms · Advanced Topics in Algebra · Holomorphic and Operator Theory
