Pulsar Binary Birthrates with Spin-Opening Angle Correlations
Richard O'Shaughnessy (1), Chunglee Kim (2) ((1) Center for, Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State University; (2) Lund Observatory)

TL;DR
This paper refines pulsar binary birthrate estimates by incorporating empirical models of pulsar beam geometry, revealing that birthrates are generally lower than previous estimates and are robust across different assumptions.
Contribution
It introduces a new method to estimate pulsar binary birthrates using empirically-motivated beaming correction factors and explores the impact of spin-misalignment angles on these estimates.
Findings
Median birthrate for tight PSR-NS binaries: 89/Myr
Median birthrate for wide PSR-NS binaries: 0.84/Myr
Median birthrate for tight PSR-WD binaries: 34/Myr
Abstract
Empirical birthrate estimates for pulsar binaries depend on the fraction of sky subtended by the pulsar beam: the pulsar beaming fraction. This fraction depends on both the pulsar's opening angle and the misalignment angle between its spin and magnetic axes. Previous estimates use the average value for only two pulsars, i.e. PSRs B1913+16 and B1534+12. We explore how birthrate predictions depend on assumptions about opening angle and alignment, using empirically-motivated distributions to define an effective beaming correction factor, f_{b,eff}. For most known pulsars, we expect f_{b,eff} to be less than 6. We also calculate f_{b,eff} for PSRs J0737-3039A and J1141-6545, applying the currently available constraints for their beam geometry. Our median posterior birthrate predictions for tight PSR-NS binaries, wide PSR-NS binaries, and tight PSR-WD binaries are 89/Myr, 0.84/Myr, and…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
