SN 2003bg: The First Type IIb Hypernova
Mario Hamuy, Jinsong Deng, Paolo A. Mazzali, Nidia I. Morrell, Mark M., Phillips, Miguel Roth, Sergio Gonzalez, Joanna Thomas-Osip, Wojtek, Krzeminski, Carlos Contreras, Jose Maza, Luis Gonzalez, Leonor Huerta, Gaston, Folatelli, Ryan Chornock, Alexei V. Filippenko

TL;DR
SN 2003bg is identified as the first Type IIb hypernova, exhibiting features of both Type IIb and hypernovae, with broad light curves and high kinetic energy indicating a massive progenitor.
Contribution
This paper presents the first detailed observations and analysis of SN 2003bg as a Type IIb hypernova, combining photometry and spectroscopy over 300 days.
Findings
Broad, high-velocity Balmer lines in early spectra
Nebular spectra resemble Type Ib/c supernovae without hydrogen
Broad bolometric light curve suggests a large progenitor mass
Abstract
Optical and near-infrared photometry and optical spectroscopy are reported for SN 2003bg, starting a few days after explosion and extending for a period of more than 300 days. Our early-time spectra reveal the presence of broad, high-velocity Balmer lines. The nebular-phase spectra, on the other hand, show a remarkable resemblance to those of Type Ib/c supernovae, without clear evidence for hydrogen. Near maximum brightness SN 2003bg displayed a bolometric luminosity comparable to that of other Type I hypernovae unrelated to gamma-ray bursts, implying a rather normal amount of 56Ni production (0.1-0.2 Msun) compared with other such objects. The bolometric light curve of SN 2003bg, on the other hand, is remarkably broad, thus suggesting a relatively large progenitor mass at the moment of explosion. These observations, together with the large value of the kinetic energy of expansion…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
