The case for a non-expanding universe
Antonio Alfonso-Faus

TL;DR
This paper argues that fundamental constants' constancy and quantum mechanics imply a non-expanding universe, with redshift explained by a varying speed of light, challenging standard cosmological models.
Contribution
It links quantum constants with cosmology, proposing a non-expanding universe based on the constancy of fundamental physical quantities.
Findings
Fundamental constants remain constant over time.
No evidence of universe expansion at the quantum level.
Redshift explained by changing speed of light.
Abstract
We present the results of two empirical constancies: the fine structure constant and the Rydberg constant. When the speed of light c is taken away from the fine structure constant, as shown elsewhere, this constancy implies the constancy of the ratio e^2/h, e the charge of the electron and h Planck constant. This forces the charge of the electron e to be constant as long as the action h (an angular momentum) is a true constant too. Then the constancy of the Rydberg expression implies that the momentum mc is also a true constant. This is just the second law of Newton. The Compton wavelength, h/mc, is then a true constant and there is no expansion at the quantum mechanical level. General relativity then predicts that the universe is not expanding. It is the only solution for cosmology. The time variation of the speed of light explains the observed red shift.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRelativity and Gravitational Theory · Scientific Research and Discoveries · Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
