On fitting planetary systems in counter-revolving configurations
Julie Gayon-Markt (1, 2), Eric Bois (2) ((1) NASA Ames Research, Center, (2) University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis / CNRS / Observatoire de la, Cote d'Azur)

TL;DR
This paper investigates the potential of counter-revolving planetary configurations to explain observed multi-planet systems, showing that such configurations can fit observational data as well as prograde models and may be common.
Contribution
It provides a comprehensive analysis of counter-revolving configurations across eight planetary systems, demonstrating their viability and potential prevalence.
Findings
Counter-revolving configurations fit observational data as well as prograde models.
Six out of eight studied systems could be stabilized by counter-revolving mechanisms.
Counter-revolving models sometimes yield slightly better data fits.
Abstract
In Gayon & Bois (2008) and Gayon etal (2009), (i) we studied the theoretical feasibility and efficiency of retrograde mean motion resonances (i.e. two planets are both in orbital resonance and in counter-revolving configuration), (ii) we showed that retrograde resonances can generate interesting mechanisms of stability, and (iii) we obtained a dynamical fit involving a counter-revolving configuration that is consistent with the observations of the HD73526 planetary system. In the present paper, we present and analyze data reductions assuming counter-revolving configurations for eight compact multi-planetary systems detected through the radial velocity method. In each case, we select the best fit leading to a dynamically stable solution. The resulting data reductions obtained in rms and chi values for counter-revolving configurations are of the same order, and sometimes slightly better,…
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
